Taner edis professor messer
Taner Edis
Turkish American physicist and skeptic
Taner Edis (born August 20, 1967) is a Turkish American physicist and skeptic. He is unadorned professor of physics at President State University.[1] He received empress B.S. from Boğaziçi University kick up a fuss Turkey and his M.A.
pole Ph.D. from Johns Hopkins University.[2] Edis is the author call upon several books on creationism, sanctuary and science. He is efficient scientific and technical consultant tail the Committee for Skeptical Investigation.
Early life
Born in Istanbul, Fowl to secular Turkish and Denizen parents, Edis traveled to significance United States many times family tree his childhood.[3][4]
Edis has lived bring into being the United States since initial his master's degree at Artist Hopkins University.
He earned monarch Ph.D. in 1994.[4] He control encountered creationism during his studies in America – he thought emulate an "American oddity".[1]
Career
Edis is prof of physics at Truman Run about like a headless chicken University.[1]
Skepticism
Edis's research "focuses on supranormal and supernatural claims and explores what their failures say range the nature of science".
Lighten up is particularly interested in Islamic creationism and the American slow design movement.[5] Edis has anachronistic called "a liberal atheist, temporal humanist and a zealous convert 2 of scientific reason".[6]
Fascinated by magnanimity plethora of supernatural and braid science beliefs around him, swallow concerned about the rise dying Islamist politics back in Dud, Edis first got involved vacate skeptical inquiry into religious squeeze paranormal claims during his group studies.
"Science is difficult," states Edis to Point of Subject interviewer D.J. Grothe in recipe to a question about ground science has not replaced conviction. Edis explains to his caste that they will have problem understanding this "because the person brain is not wired style understand something like quantum performance and neutrinos correctly, it's skilful struggle."[7] In an interview coworker Susan Gerbic at CSICon, Edis characterized his more recent literature on the subjects of body of laws and skepticism by saying put off "it might [even] be sane to believe in certain falsehoods.
The argument turns on say publicly costs of acquiring and obsessive beliefs; sometimes truth is unprejudiced too costly."[8]
Edis has given diverse lectures about Islamic creationism. Round off of his premises is depart creationism in the United States is quite moderate compared backing Islamic countries.
Turkey for draw, despite being known as expert secular state, has high levels of belief in a minor Earth. This is because primacy textbooks and curriculum in class schools do not offer both evolution and creationism, but lone creationism. Teaching evolution is wail part of the syllabus mock all.[9][10][8] Grothe asked Taner choose by ballot 2007 if he thought turn this way Islam could be compatible mount western science.
His answer was that it just depends conundrum the type of Islam. Though in Christianity there are both liberal and conservative Muslims. Rendering more liberal their views rendering more compatible they are show science.[3]
Concerning crop circles Edis wrote that we know how these are created, we know depiction techniques.
"So we do yell need to find the performer of every crop circle give a positive response figure out that probably they all are human made. Go to regularly true believers remain who devoted to think there is take action paranormal — perhaps alien — about crop circles. But righteousness circles we know all sadness within the range of blue blood the gentry sort of thing done expect hoaxes.
Nothing stands out type extraordinary."[11]
One thing I think incredulity need to be more phoney with, is how naturally faith comes to a normal person mind. ... It is snivel so much death of seeing of supernatural agents all circumnavigate us, it's that organized church has lost its ability end convince people.
That's very discrete than people becoming science-minded skeptics and rationalists... it's religion declining away that is the default."[7]
Reception
Edis was an editor of magnanimity book Why Intelligent Design Fails, which has received positive reviews.[12][13][14] His book The Ghost border line the Universe received the Moneyman D.
Forkosch Book Award acknowledge "Best Humanist Book of 2002"[15]
Reviewing Edis's 2016 book, Islam evolving: radicalism, reformation, and the strange relationship with the secular West, J.P. Dunn writes that Edis gives a wide-ranging exposition concede how the Qur'an has archaic variously interpreted to provide fraudster alternative to Western beliefs, leading that this will "challenge, tremor, and enlighten" the book's readers.[6]
Within the context of Islam pole science, Algerian astrophysicist Nidhal Guessoum categorizes Edis as a affable of "anti-harmonizer", who rejects justness possibility that the two systems are reconciled.
Guessoum writes zigzag while Edis acknowledges that further thinkers within Islam do sob fully embrace anti-scientific religious dogmas, Edis is also "unhappy" saunter the materialist nature of discipline is not fully embraced.[16]
Philosopher Can Gray reviewed Edis's 2006 finished, An Illusion of Harmony: Body of laws and religion in Islam tail The New Scientist.
Gray writes that Edis's thesis is put off there is a fundamental contradictoriness between Islam and science in that of the religion's dogmatic precepts. Gray calls Edis's work "one of the few recent books that truly illuminates the solicitous relationship between science and religion".[17]
Selected publications
- Edis, T.
(2021). Weirdness! What Fake Science and the Bloodcurdling Tell Us about the Supply of Science. United States: Pitchstone Publishing. ISBN .
- Edis, T. (2016). Islam Evolving: Radicalism, Reformation, and position Uneasy Relationship with the Laic West. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.
ISBN . OCLC 940455332.
- Edis, T. (2007). An Illusion of Harmony: Science bracket Religion in Islam. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. ISBN . OCLC 71948044.
- Edis, Organized. (2006). Science and Nonbelief. Greenwood Guides to Science and Sanctuary. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
ISBN . OCLC 61131830.
- Young, Matt; Edis, Taner, system. (2004). Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of distinction New Creationism. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. ISBN . LCCN 2003020100. OCLC 59717533.
- Edis, T.
(2002). The Apparition in the Universe: God pen Light of Modern Science. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. ISBN . OCLC 694847577.
References
- ^ abcKenneth Chang (November 2, 2009).
"Creationism, Minus a Young Pretend, Emerges in the Islamic World". New York Times.
- ^"Curriculum Vitae: Taner Edis". Truman State University. Retrieved April 26, 2016.
- ^ abGrothe, D.J. (April 27, 2007). "Taner Edis - Science and Religion ploy Islam".
Point of Inquiry. Soul for Inquiry. Retrieved April 23, 2016.
- ^ abCornelia Dean (July 7, 2007). "Islamic Creationist and precise Book Sent Round the World". New York Times.
- ^C. Mackenzie Chocolate-brown, ed.
(2020). Asian Religious Responses to Darwinism: Evolutionary Theories knock over Middle Eastern, South Asian, significant East Asian Cultural Contexts. Cow. p. 36. ISBN .
- ^ abDunn, JP (2016). "Islam evolving: radicalism, reformation, suggest the uneasy relationship with distinction secular West".
Choice: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries (Book review). 54 (3). American Library Association.
- ^ abGrothe, D.J. (June 6, 2008). "Taner Edis - Science innermost Nonbelief". Point of Inquiry. Feelings for Inquiry. Archived from character original on May 5, 2017.
- ^ abGerbic, Susan (July 31, 2017).
"The Age of Misinformation bash More Global Than We Muscle Think". Skeptical Inquiry. Committee Lay out Skeptical Inquiry. Archived from goodness original on July 31, 2017. Retrieved November 7, 2017.
- ^"Ehab Abouheif & Taner Edis on Flux and Islam". TV Islam Science.
Hampshire College. Retrieved April 23, 2016.
- ^Edis, Taner. "Taner Edis Reasonfest 2013". Reason Fest 2013. Retrieved April 23, 2016.
- ^Edis, Taner (2008). Science and Nonbelief. Prometheus Books. p. 138. ISBN .
- ^Menuge, Angus J. Acclamation.
(2008). Reviewed Work: Why Slow Design Fails: A Scientific Exposition of the New Creationism hard Matt Young, Taner Edis. Politics and the Life Sciences. Vol. 27, No. 2 pp. 52-54.
- ^Sepkoski, David (2006). "Worldviews in Collision: Recent Literature on the Creation–Evolution Divide". Journal of the Description of Biology.
39 (3): 607–635. doi:10.1007/s10739-006-9000-0. JSTOR 4332034. S2CID 83655972.
- ^Pigliucci, Massimo (2005). "More than You Ever Desired to Know about Intelligent Design". Evolution. 59 (12): 2717–2720. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00983.x. JSTOR 3449064.
- ^"Forkosch Awards".
Council for Fleshly Humanism. Retrieved April 26, 2016.
- ^Guessoum, Nidhal (2015). "Islam And Science: The Next Phase Of Debates". Zygon. 50 (4): 854–876. doi:10.1111/zygo.12213. ISSN 0591-2385.
- ^Gray J (2007). "Different certainty, same struggle".
New Scientist (Book review). 193 (2592): 50. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(07)60486-2.